Posts Tagged ‘ Social Media

Is Facebook one of the Four Horsemen of the Gaming Apocalypse?

When the Lamb opened the third seal, I heard the third living creature say, “Come!” I looked, and there before me was a black horse! Its rider was holding a pair of scales in his hand. Then I heard what sounded like a voice among the four living creatures, saying, “A quart of wheat for a day’s wages, and three quarts of barley for a day’s wages, and do not damage the oil and the wine!”

— Revelation 6:5-6 NIV

After an interesting conversation during a call tonight, and some deep thought of my own, it does make me wonder where the industry is headed these days. With Social Media sites on the rise as gaming platforms, primarily for the sake of this article, Facebook. As well as a lot of companies now gearing their efforts towards development and publishing to make use of these platforms it has me thinking.

I’ve had a lot of people comment to me that they’re finding more and more games that just aren’t catching their interest anymore, or are down right boring. I’ve noticed this myself that a lot of times games aren’t really innovating anything new, just putting on shiny new clothes.

Of course there are plenty of exceptions to this, but not as many as there once were. And to be candid, a lot of the games found on Facebook are without a doubt, boring as crap, yet they get millions of players daily and the market is growing constantly with more and more companies and indie teams getting into the act.

Is the industry headed for another crash before we see a renaissance of creativity and an explosion of innovative creation across the board of games? Honestly, I don’t know, but at the same time as more companies pull away from making console games and of course the continuing stigma of PC gaming aside from the MMO market. (Which is constantly being accused of being clones upon clones upon clones of this game or that game?)

Where is the industry headed?

Where will our new gaming experiences going to coming from?

Has the bubble burst again?

Tough questions; and maybe a bit of an alarmist bent to my thinking as I look over the scope of the gaming space these days. A lot of companies have been cutting stuff, shutting down, restructuring, and changing direction, so on, so forth, etcetera, and etcetera.

So I but it to all of you dear friends and readers, is this new explosion of gaming on social platforms a sign of great change that will push the industry into a new era of creativity or is Facebook the rider of the black horse, preparing to spread a famine amongst hardcore games and gamers while it sows the seeds of meaningless fluff?

Comment below.

Networking Etiquette, Twitter – Following the Followers.

There are times when I wonder about the state of the world, and then there are times, I simply getting annoyed over the little things. Now I understand people whom actively use twitter would love to have followers and have people who find them interesting want to follow their tweets for a variety of reasons.

Of course we all hate spam bots and we detest getting stupid tweets from said bots, but then there’s interesting people whom would be under normal circumstances great to follow and even interact with via Twitter. However something occurs that for whatever reason annoys the crap out of me.

Someone follows you and you check them out and hey they’re not a spam bot, but someone interesting so you follow them back, a bit of time passes and then suddenly they un-followed you for no obvious reason and yet you’re still following them along with a pant load of other people whom were probably drawn in much the same way.

Now I can understand filtering out people whom annoy, offend, or otherwise just aren’t interesting anymore, but to unfollow people en masse just to have a nice high follower count (or so it would appear) just seems kind of cheap. Celebrities get away with it for obvious reasons as they’re usually not even the ones doing the tweeting, or they don’t want to be flooded with the silly toils of every Tom, Dick, and Harry. But when it comes to the regular folks whom probably just like having a large following without any real interaction with them, or better still without being interesting in any way do it, it’s no different than the folks on social networking sites who make friends with everyone but doesn’t speak to anyone.

I generally have the policy of following back people who follow me, unless they either turn out to be spam bots, complete idiots, or just plan don’t tweet for several months. It’s partly because it’s the polite thing to do, and also because I enjoy interacting with people from all over the place in many different industries.

What kicked off this particular rant was going through my twitter account today and discovered a whole slew of people I’d been following no longer seem to be following me and while it might be that I’m just not that interesting, it could also be they don’t want to appear to be uncool by following more than they are being followed.

I’ll never really know the case and maybe I just don’t want to, no belay that, I do want to know, who wouldn’t? I’d love to know if I some how pissed someone off, or if I’m simply not that interesting anymore. It’d make me more aware of how I might have done such a thing, or it might aid me in being more interesting to those whom do follow me.

I’m quite sure others feel the same way, so what’s the moral of this rant? If you’re just out to get followers then either be really interesting, or build them the old fashioned way by communicating with people. If you’re just in it for the popularity, then you either need to star in some A-list movies, or grow up and get passed the grade school mentality.

Networking etiquette dictates that to build successful connections you need to be open and interactive with those connections, not just have a long list of names of people you really have no interest in.

At least that’s my understanding of things; feel free to correct me in the comments!